GRE寫作提綱舉例指導（9）
8 、It is often necessary, even desirable, for political leaders to withhold information from the public.
部分同意
1、承認為了獲得政治領導權 win the political game需要withhold informaion to gain political power; disclose every personal flaw, shortcoming, foibles opponents will take advantage; no need to be complete honest
2、關系到 classic information of the government要保留 national defence，attack on drug dealers
3、但在關系到人民利益的時候隱瞞信息會對人們造成危害，使政府失去信任 the panic caused by SARS derived from China in 2003 was mostly initia ted by the closure of information by the government of Beijing. Lots of citizens are not available to take measures to protect from this deadly disease.
It is always impossible for the political leaders to reveal everything to the public, especially some the information which can affect the national security. Different nations are competing and even antagonistic. Revealing some information could has no help for the solution but poses negative impact on the stability of a country. Unidentified illness
Withholding information should not be the excuse for political leaders to abuse their power.
Withholding information at their will could provide the chance of corruption, 在不威脅國家安全，社會穩定情況下，政府行為應該盡可能透明，接受監督。
【題目】 It is often necessary, even desirable, for political leaders to withhold information from the public.
【翻譯】對于政治領導者來說，向人民大眾隱瞞信息通常是必要的，甚至有益的。少數和多數的關系之 true lies, the truth is out there.
【提綱】
1、向人民大眾隱瞞一些信息在一些情況下是有必要的，甚至是有宜的，例子，政府準備到某個 state 進行人們生活質量的考察，之前就很有必要不要告訴大家，因為如果告訴了 the public ，那么那個state 的領導可能會做一些表明工作，那么考察到的就不是真實情況了【這是看的別人的例子，實在沒想出來】
2、在一些情況下告訴 the public 實情還能幫助政府度過危機【例子就是 SARS 在2002 年在中國，如果不告知民眾，那么很有可能大家不知道如何預防這種 virus，使得更多的人染上它，但告知后，人民在政府的領導下，降低了感染上這種 virus 的人數，成功的控制了 virus】
3、總結
領導對公眾有所保留
一、適當的保留是必須的，無論是上臺前還是上臺后 imcompatible 。但長期不行。
二、在上臺前，誠實是無用的美德 Before the political leader is elected, honesty is not a useful virtue for candidates
1.民眾不信任，給對手留空隙
2.沒辦法完全保證承諾能實現，布什的減稅計劃因 911 而沒實現
三、上臺后有時隱瞞信息也是必要的。After being elected, it is advantaged to conceal some information for the leader either.
1.國家安全，國家安全會議
2.經濟利益，海帶豐收
3.公眾容易恐慌，禽流感傳聞
四、on the other hand, people in any democracy will throw down the gauntlet to the goverments blackout, or put it bluntly, so-called fooling the public, in the long run.
1、民主社會，人民才是主人
2、 empirical evidence of economy，持續通脹 counterproductive
3、長期欺騙只有 downfall, abuse, subversi on of administration
8T 個體和整體 政治類 It is often necessary, even desirable, for political leaders to withhold information from the public. 8 . 政治領導們在公眾面前有所保留是必要的，甚至是必須的。
① 在某些情況下，封閉信息是需要。A 如國防 national defense，抓捕犯人 culprit等B 有時群眾了解的信息可能是片面的，引起騷動，還不如不了解 Admittedly, sometimes it is necessary for political leaders to keep the public from know something, such as countrys top secret, which is indispensable and helpful for a country in defending aggression and keeping safety.
② 公開信息更有利于群眾與政府的互動，更利于幫助政府把事情辦好. 如：現在很多地方的政府網站，以及攝像頭等。
③ 公開信息還有一個優勢：防止權力的腐敗 反面說：引起腐敗，and therefore bring detriment to society.
Firstly, political leaders, in a democracy regime, will harm the proper right of people as they withhold information from the public.
Secondly, withholding information from the public will result in corruption in the government, and therefore bring detriment to society.
8 、It is often necessary, even desirable, for political leaders to withhold information from the public.
部分同意
1、承認為了獲得政治領導權 win the political game需要withhold informaion to gain political power; disclose every personal flaw, shortcoming, foibles opponents will take advantage; no need to be complete honest
2、關系到 classic information of the government要保留 national defence，attack on drug dealers
3、但在關系到人民利益的時候隱瞞信息會對人們造成危害，使政府失去信任 the panic caused by SARS derived from China in 2003 was mostly initia ted by the closure of information by the government of Beijing. Lots of citizens are not available to take measures to protect from this deadly disease.
It is always impossible for the political leaders to reveal everything to the public, especially some the information which can affect the national security. Different nations are competing and even antagonistic. Revealing some information could has no help for the solution but poses negative impact on the stability of a country. Unidentified illness
Withholding information should not be the excuse for political leaders to abuse their power.
Withholding information at their will could provide the chance of corruption, 在不威脅國家安全，社會穩定情況下，政府行為應該盡可能透明，接受監督。
【題目】 It is often necessary, even desirable, for political leaders to withhold information from the public.
【翻譯】對于政治領導者來說，向人民大眾隱瞞信息通常是必要的，甚至有益的。少數和多數的關系之 true lies, the truth is out there.
【提綱】
1、向人民大眾隱瞞一些信息在一些情況下是有必要的，甚至是有宜的，例子，政府準備到某個 state 進行人們生活質量的考察，之前就很有必要不要告訴大家，因為如果告訴了 the public ，那么那個state 的領導可能會做一些表明工作，那么考察到的就不是真實情況了【這是看的別人的例子，實在沒想出來】
2、在一些情況下告訴 the public 實情還能幫助政府度過危機【例子就是 SARS 在2002 年在中國，如果不告知民眾，那么很有可能大家不知道如何預防這種 virus，使得更多的人染上它，但告知后，人民在政府的領導下，降低了感染上這種 virus 的人數，成功的控制了 virus】
3、總結
領導對公眾有所保留
一、適當的保留是必須的，無論是上臺前還是上臺后 imcompatible 。但長期不行。
二、在上臺前，誠實是無用的美德 Before the political leader is elected, honesty is not a useful virtue for candidates
1.民眾不信任，給對手留空隙
2.沒辦法完全保證承諾能實現，布什的減稅計劃因 911 而沒實現
三、上臺后有時隱瞞信息也是必要的。After being elected, it is advantaged to conceal some information for the leader either.
1.國家安全，國家安全會議
2.經濟利益，海帶豐收
3.公眾容易恐慌，禽流感傳聞
四、on the other hand, people in any democracy will throw down the gauntlet to the goverments blackout, or put it bluntly, so-called fooling the public, in the long run.
1、民主社會，人民才是主人
2、 empirical evidence of economy，持續通脹 counterproductive
3、長期欺騙只有 downfall, abuse, subversi on of administration
8T 個體和整體 政治類 It is often necessary, even desirable, for political leaders to withhold information from the public. 8 . 政治領導們在公眾面前有所保留是必要的，甚至是必須的。
① 在某些情況下，封閉信息是需要。A 如國防 national defense，抓捕犯人 culprit等B 有時群眾了解的信息可能是片面的，引起騷動，還不如不了解 Admittedly, sometimes it is necessary for political leaders to keep the public from know something, such as countrys top secret, which is indispensable and helpful for a country in defending aggression and keeping safety.
② 公開信息更有利于群眾與政府的互動，更利于幫助政府把事情辦好. 如：現在很多地方的政府網站，以及攝像頭等。
③ 公開信息還有一個優勢：防止權力的腐敗 反面說：引起腐敗，and therefore bring detriment to society.
Firstly, political leaders, in a democracy regime, will harm the proper right of people as they withhold information from the public.
Secondly, withholding information from the public will result in corruption in the government, and therefore bring detriment to society.
