gre改革后新版gre寫作新題庫里的作文方面的一個重要變化是有了指導語。而指導語的作用是有助于我們的邏輯性寫作，以下是新版gre寫作新題庫內有關argument21的寫作部分：

　　題目：

　　The following appeared in an article written by Dr. Karp, an anthropologist.

　　Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather than by their own biological parents. However, my recent interviews with children living in the group of islands that includes Tertia show that these children spend much more time talking about their biological parents than about other adults in the village. This research of mine proves that Dr. Fields conclusion about Tertian village culture is invalid and thus that the observation-centered approach to studying cultures is invalid as well. The interview-centered method that my team of graduate students is currently using in Tertia will establish a much more accurate understanding of child-rearing traditions there and in other island cultures.

　　Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.

　　中文翻譯：

　　20年前，知名人類學F博士訪問了T島，并從他的觀察中得出結論：T島的孩子是由整個村子撫養長大而不是他們的親生父母。然而，我最近對生活在T島以及周邊一些島嶼的兒童采訪顯示，他們在談話中談到他們呢雙親的時間遠遠多于談到村莊里其他成年人。我的這次研究證明F博士關于T島鄉村文化的結論是錯的，因此這種以觀察為主的文化研習方式也是無效的。由于我那些在T目前調研的研究生們正是采用我的采訪為主的方法，所以他們將會對T島孩子撫養傳統已經其他島嶼文化給出更加精確的了解。

　　寫一篇回應，討論還需要何種具體的證據才能更好的評估上面的論證，并解釋這個證據是如何強化/削弱這篇文章的論證的。

　　此上就是新版gre寫作新題庫 argument21的內容從今天起小編就給大家連續提供新版gre寫作新題庫argument部分的內容。希望大家能夠在練習中提高自己的寫作水平。

　　gre改革后新版gre寫作新題庫里的作文方面的一個重要變化是有了指導語。而指導語的作用是有助于我們的邏輯性寫作，以下是新版gre寫作新題庫內有關argument21的寫作部分：

　　題目：

　　The following appeared in an article written by Dr. Karp, an anthropologist.

　　Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather than by their own biological parents. However, my recent interviews with children living in the group of islands that includes Tertia show that these children spend much more time talking about their biological parents than about other adults in the village. This research of mine proves that Dr. Fields conclusion about Tertian village culture is invalid and thus that the observation-centered approach to studying cultures is invalid as well. The interview-centered method that my team of graduate students is currently using in Tertia will establish a much more accurate understanding of child-rearing traditions there and in other island cultures.

　　Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.

　　中文翻譯：

　　20年前，知名人類學F博士訪問了T島，并從他的觀察中得出結論：T島的孩子是由整個村子撫養長大而不是他們的親生父母。然而，我最近對生活在T島以及周邊一些島嶼的兒童采訪顯示，他們在談話中談到他們呢雙親的時間遠遠多于談到村莊里其他成年人。我的這次研究證明F博士關于T島鄉村文化的結論是錯的，因此這種以觀察為主的文化研習方式也是無效的。由于我那些在T目前調研的研究生們正是采用我的采訪為主的方法，所以他們將會對T島孩子撫養傳統已經其他島嶼文化給出更加精確的了解。

　　寫一篇回應，討論還需要何種具體的證據才能更好的評估上面的論證，并解釋這個證據是如何強化/削弱這篇文章的論證的。

　　此上就是新版gre寫作新題庫 argument21的內容從今天起小編就給大家連續提供新版gre寫作新題庫argument部分的內容。希望大家能夠在練習中提高自己的寫作水平。