新版gre寫作新題庫：argument168
gre改革后新版gre寫作新題庫里的作文方面的一個重要變化是有了指導(dǎo)語。而指導(dǎo)語的作用是有助于我們的邏輯性寫作，以下是新版gre寫作新題庫內(nèi)有關(guān)argument168的寫作部分：
題目：
The following is a letter that recently appeared in the Oak City Gazette, a local newspaper.
The primary function of the Committee for a Better Oak City is to advise the city government on how to make the best use of the citys limited budget. However, at some of our recent meetings we failed to make important decisions because of the foolish objections raised by committee members who are not even residents of Oak City. People who work in Oak City but who live elsewhere cannot fully understand the business and politics of the city. After all, only Oak City residents pay city taxes, and therefore only residents understand how that money could best be used to improve the city. We recommend, then, that the Committee for a Better Oak City vote to restrict its membership to city residents only. We predict that, without the interference of non-residents, the committee will be able to make Oak City a better place in which to live and work.
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the predicted result. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
中文翻譯：
O城市改善委員會的主要責任就是在如果更好使用有限的預(yù)算方面給予其建議。但是，在最近的會議上我們沒有做出任何的重要的決定，是因為在會議上一些并非O市民的委員們提出的愚蠢的反對意見。那些只在O工作而不居住的人是根本不可能完全了解這里的政治和經(jīng)濟的。總而言之，只有O的市民繳稅，因此只有他們才知道如何使用這筆錢更好的改善本市。所以我們的建議是城市改善委員會的委員們只有O市市民才可以投票。我們預(yù)計沒有了外地人的干預(yù)，這個委員會會使我們O市變成更適宜工作和居住的城市。
寫一篇回應(yīng)，在其中討論還有哪些問題需要被回答才能決定文中的推薦是否能得到預(yù)期結(jié)果，并務(wù)請解釋對這些問題的回答是如何幫助更好的評估文中的建議的。
此上就是新版gre寫作新題庫 argument168的內(nèi)容從今天起小編就給大家連續(xù)提供新版gre寫作新題庫argument部分的內(nèi)容。希望大家能夠在練習中提高自己的寫作水平。
gre改革后新版gre寫作新題庫里的作文方面的一個重要變化是有了指導(dǎo)語。而指導(dǎo)語的作用是有助于我們的邏輯性寫作，以下是新版gre寫作新題庫內(nèi)有關(guān)argument168的寫作部分：
題目：
The following is a letter that recently appeared in the Oak City Gazette, a local newspaper.
The primary function of the Committee for a Better Oak City is to advise the city government on how to make the best use of the citys limited budget. However, at some of our recent meetings we failed to make important decisions because of the foolish objections raised by committee members who are not even residents of Oak City. People who work in Oak City but who live elsewhere cannot fully understand the business and politics of the city. After all, only Oak City residents pay city taxes, and therefore only residents understand how that money could best be used to improve the city. We recommend, then, that the Committee for a Better Oak City vote to restrict its membership to city residents only. We predict that, without the interference of non-residents, the committee will be able to make Oak City a better place in which to live and work.
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the predicted result. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
中文翻譯：
O城市改善委員會的主要責任就是在如果更好使用有限的預(yù)算方面給予其建議。但是，在最近的會議上我們沒有做出任何的重要的決定，是因為在會議上一些并非O市民的委員們提出的愚蠢的反對意見。那些只在O工作而不居住的人是根本不可能完全了解這里的政治和經(jīng)濟的。總而言之，只有O的市民繳稅，因此只有他們才知道如何使用這筆錢更好的改善本市。所以我們的建議是城市改善委員會的委員們只有O市市民才可以投票。我們預(yù)計沒有了外地人的干預(yù)，這個委員會會使我們O市變成更適宜工作和居住的城市。
寫一篇回應(yīng)，在其中討論還有哪些問題需要被回答才能決定文中的推薦是否能得到預(yù)期結(jié)果，并務(wù)請解釋對這些問題的回答是如何幫助更好的評估文中的建議的。
此上就是新版gre寫作新題庫 argument168的內(nèi)容從今天起小編就給大家連續(xù)提供新版gre寫作新題庫argument部分的內(nèi)容。希望大家能夠在練習中提高自己的寫作水平。
